|
Home Advertising Biographies Business Directories Cemeteries Census Class Reunion Family Bibles Family Links History of Madison County Location Lookups Maps Madison County Links Marriages Mortality Schedules Newspaper Clippings Obituaries Ohio County Formation Perpetual Calendar Photo Album Queries Surnames Who Are They? Wills Contact us
Search Engine
| Member | |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
SMITH, HON. HENRY W., Lawyer, was born on April 6th, 1814, in the town of Whitestown, Oneida county, New York. His ancestors were from Great Briatin, and settled in Massachusetts and Connecticut in the early days of our colonial history. He was educated in the common schools principally, although he attended the academy at Champion and the Rensselaer Oswego Academy in New York. When he was three years old his father, who was a farmer, moved to Jefferson county, in the State of New York. Henry was raised on a farm, working summers and going to the common schools in the winters. His leisure time was spent in study and reading while on the farm. In May, 1838, he emigrated to Ohio, and stopped at Circleville. In June following he commenced the study of law with H. N. Hedges, Esq., with whom he remained about one year. He completed his study of law with G. W. doan, Esq. In June, 1840, he was admitted to the bar by the Supreme Court, at Delaware, Ohio. Shortly afterwards he settled in London, in Madison county, Ohio, where he has resided ever since and has been engaged in the practice of his profession. He was elected Prosecuting Attorney in the fall of 1840, in 1842 and in 1844, thus holding the office for six consecutive years, the last term expiring in 1846. In 1858 he was appointed to fill a vacancy in the same office, by the court; in the fall of 1860 he was again elected thereto for two years, and yet again in 1864. The duties were performed by him during all that time to the satisfaction of the court and the people. His business in his profession has been extensive and lucrative; he has acquired a compentence and has raised a large family. He commenced poor, without money or frineds, but he soon acquired both. In his politics, Mr. Smith belonged to the old Whig party as long as it lasted, and in 1856 he became a member of the Republican party, and has always remained a consistent and active member of that party to the present time. In the fall of 1848 he was elected a member of the House of Representatives of the General Assembly of Ohio, for the counties of Madison, Clarke and Champaign, and was re-elected in 1849. During his legislative service, in the winters of 1848-49 and in 1849-50, he was an active and useful member, and originated and carried through a great reform in the law of evidence. Prior to that time, by the law of evidence, neither parties in an action at law, nor any person, having any pecuniary interest, in the event of a suit could be witnesses. The law seemed to be based on the theory, that a witness who had a pecuniary interest, large or small, in the event of a suit, would be tempted to, and often would, commit perjury, and hence parties to a suit could not testify, nor any person having a pecuniary interest, in the event of a suit at law. Mr. Smith, early in the session of 1848-49, introduced a bill "To improve the law of evidence," providing that partis to actions at law might call each other as witnesses, and that a pecuniary interest, in the event of a suit, should not disqualify a person from being a witness. The bill, after its second reading, was referred to Mr. Smith and the Hon. George E. Pugh as a select committee. On the 21st of February, 1849, Mr. Smith of said committee made an elaborate report on the bill, which was ordered to be rpinted. The report can be found in the "Appendix to the House Journal," session of 1848-49, page 185. The proposed reform was so bold and radical, in striking down rules venerable for their antiquity, that many members hesitated, although the report in favor of said measure was unanswerable and absolutely convincing. finally it was proposed, in order to give the bar time for reflection and consideration, to postpone the measure till the next session, which was done. During the next session, 1849-50, the measure was passed into a law with remarkable unanimity (vide vol. xlviii., page 33, session laws of 1849-50). This was a great advance in law reform. This remained to be the law till the adoption of the Code in Ohio, when the same principle was carried into the Code, extended a little on one point by allowing parties to volunteer as witnesses. In the session of 1848-49 Mr. Smith introduced a bill to amend the law of descents, by providing that husband and wife, in default of children, should be heirs to each other. Prior to that time, adn for a short time after, the act regulating descents postponed the heirship of husband and wife to the last degree before property escheated ot the State. The bill was referred to Mr. Smith as a select committee, and on the 24th of February, 1849, he made an exhaustive report thereon, which was ordered to be printed. The report is in the "Appendix to the House Journal" for 1848-49, page 198. This bill did not then pass; and, as it proposed such a radical change in the rules of descent, a great many of the members were afraid to support it, not because it was not reasonable and equitable, but because it was a great innovation; the seeds were sown, however, and produced fruit in due time. In the session of 1851-52 the principle was adopted, and ever since that time husband and wife, in default of children, have been heirs to each other. At the same session he introduced a bill to punish the stealing of a will, after the death of the testator, or a testamentary paper before his death. The bill was enacted into a law, February 23d, 1849 (vide S. and C. "Statutes," vol. ii., page 1632). Thus a great omission in our criminal law was supplied in the State. In the fall of 1853 Mr. Smtih was elected to the Senate of Ohio from the district composed of Madison, Clarke and Champaign counties. He made a useful and active member, and assisted in enacting a great deal of useful legislation, including the Liquor law, the Ten Per Cent. law, the Fee bill, etc., etc., and aided in reforming abuses and in reducing taxation. He discovered, at the end of his term in the Senate, in the spring of 1854, that he could not live very high and support his family by going to the Legislature (as many more have before and since discovered), and he determined to abstain therefrom in the future and to devote his time exclusively to his profession. This determination he rigidly adhered to until 1864, when he was nominated and elected a Presidential Elector by the Republicans, when the Hon. A. Lincoln was a candidate for re-election to the Presidency. He met the Electoral College of ohio at the capital of the State in December, 1864, and voted for Mr. Lincoln for President and Andrew Johnson for Vice-President of the United States. In the spring of 1865 he aided in establishing the Madison National Bank, of London, Ohio, and he was elected President thereof, so continuing for two and one-half years, when he sold his stock and invested the proceeds in land. In 1870 he was appointed Assessor of Internal Revenue by President Grant, and confirmed by the Senate of the United States, for the Seventh Collection District of Ohio, and he held the office for nearly three years, when, the taxes having all been taken off by Congress except upon whiskey, beer and tobacco, the assessors of internal revenue were abolished by a law of congress. During his term as Assessor nearly $2,000,000 internal revenue was raised in the district, comprising the counties of Franklin, Madison, Green and Clarke. He administered the office prudently and honestly, and to the satisfaction of the government and the people. Mr. Smith is still engaged in the practice of law. He supported the war of 1861 strenuously, but did not go into the service, as he was over the military age when the war commenced. He did, however, go into the service for ten days, at Camp Chase, during the Morgan raid, as Captain of a company. He was married in June, 1844, to an estimable lady, Jennette Smith, in Whitestown, Oneida county, New York. She is a descendant of the celebrated Otis family, of revolutionary memory, in Massachusetts. She has been a model wife and an ornament of her sex. Mr. Smith is still hale and vigorous, and stands a fair chance to live beyond the allotted age of man
This is a volunteer project. We depend upon feedback from our visitors. If you have information to share or have resources relating to Madison County, we would love to hear from you.
Design by 
Hosted by Ancestral Sites